Goto

Collaborating Authors

 context class


Appendix

Neural Information Processing Systems

This is the Appendix for "Self-Supervised Learning Disentangled Group Representation as Feature". Table .1 summarizes the abbreviations and the symbols used in the main paper.Abbreviation/Symbol Meaning Abbreviation SSL Self-supervised Learning SL Supervised Learning DCI Disentangle Metric for Informativeness IRS Interventional Robustness Score EXP Explicitness Score MOD Modularity Score LR Logistic Regression GBT Gradient Boosted Trees OOD Out-Of-Distributed Symbol in Theory U Semantic space X V ector space I Image space G Group G ( x) Group orbit w.r .t.G containing the sample x ϕ Image generation process U I φ Visual representation I X f Semantic representation U X m The number of decomposed subgroups Symbol in Algorithm P Partition of dataset P Learned partition through Eq. (3) P Set of partitions used in Eq. (2) N Number of training images θ "Dummy" parameter used by IRM I Image X List of abbreviations and symbols used in the paper. Section A provides the preliminary knowledge about the group theory. Section D presents the additional experimental results. 1 A Preliminaries Groups often arise as transformations of some space, such as a set, vector space, or topological space. The set of clockwise rotations w.r .t. its centroid to retain We say this group of rotations act on the triangle, which is formally defined below.


Appendix

Neural Information Processing Systems

This is the Appendix for "Self-Supervised Learning Disentangled Group Representation as Feature". Table .1 summarizes the abbreviations and the symbols used in the main paper.Abbreviation/Symbol Meaning Abbreviation SSL Self-supervised Learning SL Supervised Learning DCI Disentangle Metric for Informativeness IRS Interventional Robustness Score EXP Explicitness Score MOD Modularity Score LR Logistic Regression GBT Gradient Boosted Trees OOD Out-Of-Distributed Symbol in Theory U Semantic space X V ector space I Image space G Group G ( x) Group orbit w.r .t.G containing the sample x ϕ Image generation process U I φ Visual representation I X f Semantic representation U X m The number of decomposed subgroups Symbol in Algorithm P Partition of dataset P Learned partition through Eq. (3) P Set of partitions used in Eq. (2) N Number of training images θ "Dummy" parameter used by IRM I Image X List of abbreviations and symbols used in the paper. Section A provides the preliminary knowledge about the group theory. Section D presents the additional experimental results. 1 A Preliminaries Groups often arise as transformations of some space, such as a set, vector space, or topological space. The set of clockwise rotations w.r .t. its centroid to retain We say this group of rotations act on the triangle, which is formally defined below.


Simple Neural Network on MCUs

#artificialintelligence

Edge computing is one of those things where you have the nails and are still looking for a hammer. In an earlier post, I wrote about Why Machine Learning on the Edge is critical. Pete Warden has also shared interesting insights in Why The Future of Machine Learning is Tiny. There will be many exciting technologies coming out to accelerate the development in this space. Today, we are going to look at how to deploy a neural network (NN) on a microcontroller (MCU) with uTensor.


Simple Neural Network on MCUs – Hackster Blog

#artificialintelligence

Edge computing is one of those things where you have the nails and are still looking for a hammer. In an earlier post, I wrote about Why Machine Learning on the Edge is critical. Pete Warden has also shared interesting insights in Why The Future of Machine Learning is Tiny. There will be many exciting technologies coming out to accelerate the development in this space. Today, we are going to look at how to deploy a neural network (NN) on a microcontroller (MCU) with uTensor.


Context-Dependent Classes in a Hybrid Recurrent Network-HMM Speech Recognition System

Neural Information Processing Systems

A method for incorporating context-dependent phone classes in a connectionist-HMM hybrid speech recognition system is introduced. A modular approach is adopted, where single-layer networks discriminate between different context classes given the phone class and the acoustic data. The context networks are combined with a context-independent (CI) network to generate context-dependent (CD) phone probability estimates. Experiments show an average reduction in word error rate of 16% and 13% from the CI system on ARPA 5,000 word and SQALE 20,000 word tasks respectively. Due to improved modelling, the decoding speed of the CD system is more than twice as fast as the CI system.


Context-Dependent Classes in a Hybrid Recurrent Network-HMM Speech Recognition System

Neural Information Processing Systems

A method for incorporating context-dependent phone classes in a connectionist-HMM hybrid speech recognition system is introduced. A modular approach is adopted, where single-layer networks discriminate between different context classes given the phone class and the acoustic data. The context networks are combined with a context-independent (CI) network to generate context-dependent (CD) phone probability estimates. Experiments show an average reduction in word error rate of 16% and 13% from the CI system on ARPA 5,000 word and SQALE 20,000 word tasks respectively. Due to improved modelling, the decoding speed of the CD system is more than twice as fast as the CI system.


Context-Dependent Classes in a Hybrid Recurrent Network-HMM Speech Recognition System

Neural Information Processing Systems

A method for incorporating context-dependent phone classes in a connectionist-HMM hybrid speech recognition system is introduced. Amodular approach is adopted, where single-layer networks discriminate between different context classes given the phone class and the acoustic data. The context networks are combined with a context-independent (CI) network to generate context-dependent (CD) phone probability estimates. Experiments show an average reduction in word error rate of 16% and 13% from the CI system on ARPA 5,000 word and SQALE 20,000 word tasks respectively. Due to improved modelling, the decoding speed of the CD system is more than twice as fast as the CI system.